In almost every offense across college football, you can find some version of the run-pass option RPO. Each has its own way of running an RPO package. I have been very fortunate to have worked with and for some great football coaches during my career. From offensive coaches like Mark Richt and Mike Bobo to defensive coaches such as Willie Martinez and Chris Rippon to special teams wizard Doc Holliday, these coaches and many more are true football men. All have had some level of influence on my coaching career play option my beliefs on what it means to be a football coach.
However, none has had as great an impact on what I believe in schematically as an offensive coach than Play option Legg. He is a master teacher of one-back offense. Marshall football has always been synonymous with explosive offensive football.
From Chad Pennington and Randy Moss to Byron Leftwich and most recently with Rakeem Cato, there has been no shortage of great players who have thrived putting up points for The Herd over the years.
- However, we commonly hear announcers and sometimes our friends mix up the difference between a Play action pass, RPO and read option.
- The distinction between American and European options has nothing to do with geography, only with early exercise.
- Puria method on binary options
- Types[ edit ] An option offense is any football scheme that relies on option running plays as its cornerstone.
- The Basics of the Option Play ~ Perfect Pervis
My time at Marshall and with Legg was no different. We were a true spread offense with four and five eligible receivers flexed that operated at a fast pace. But what really took us to another level was the incorporation play option RPOs into our system.
X’s & O’s: Run-Pass Option (RPO) Simplified
The idea of finding a conflict defender on every play, then actually putting that guy in a run-pass conflict was a krupenich options yet brilliant idea. Not an idea that play option created at Marshall or by Legg, because some version of RPOs have been run for a long time now, but one that was refined, simplified and executed in an extremely efficient manner.
I became obsessed with this part of our offense. These plays put us in the ultimate win-win situation offensively. It was double- and triple-option football with a downfield pass, basically new age wishbone football out of spread formations.
Essential Options Trading Guide
And what made us different was the simplicity play option which we were operating our RPO package. Because of that, we kept our conflict plays simple, learning was at a minimum and execution was at a maximum, a formula that proved to be very successful in my time with Legg.
We classify our RPOs into three categories. The decision is simple.
We try to decrease the amount of gray area in making the decision by defining what leverage means: width and depth. Does our receiver have width leverage on the conflict defender by play option him in his alignment?
If he does, the pre-snap decision by the quarterback is to throw the play option. Diagram 1 As you can see in Diagram 1, the pre-snap decision for the quarterback is easy. Based off the alignment of the apex linebacker to either side, we have width leverage to throw the football.
We give the outside receivers the ability to run off their defender versus press-man coverage. If it starts as press and the corner then bails to zone coverage on the snap, the receiver must now know to block the corner. Diagram 2 In Diagram 2, the defense has rotated to a one-high safety look, dropping down the free safety into the boundary to take away width leverage on our F receiver.
This is an example of another simple pre-snap decision for the quarterback: no width leverage to either side, he should now execute the zone read play that we play option tagged to this particular RPO.
We also use depth to define leverage. The conflict defender may have taken away our width leverage by widening his alignment, but we will also read how much the depth he has in relation to receiver.
If he is deep enough, usually yards off the ball in his alignment, we think that we have enough depth leverage to throw the ball. If he is tighter than that, usually linebacker level, then we do not have depth or width leverage and the ball cannot be thrown.
Diagram 3 In Diagram 3, you can see the defense has again rotated to a one-high safety look, dropping the strong safety to the field to cover down on our Y receiver. This is a typical response by a defense to our RPO package is to give us one-high safety looks, often times playing man-to-man coverage. However, we will still look play option play option if we have leverage pre-snap to throw the ball. You can see that the strong safety has taken away width leverage, but is still yards off in his alignment.
We consider this enough depth leverage to execute a throw.
The Basics of the Option Play
Because of our tempo and the fact that defenses like to disguise their coverage, we see that even in one-high play option looks, we still have leverage to throw the ball many times. Usually the routes associated with our leveraged-based RPOs are quick screens, such as bubbles or smokes, which require a block on the perimeter by one or two other offensive players not catching the ball. As a result, we play option take reading leverage to another level by reading force See Diagram 4.
In some defenses, the conflict defender will take away our throw by getting width and not have depth in his alignment. Diagram 4 Play option conflict plays are by far the simplest form of RPOs in our game. The decision is pre-snap for the quarterback, making it easier to read, and the routes are short and quick, making them easier to complete. However, as simple as these plays seem, they have by far been our most effective in our offense.
Option offense - Wikipedia
The play averaged 6. We handed the ball off 43 times for an average of 6. It was one play option our most consistent and play option plays. It is easy to learn and easy to teach, therefore, easy to practice and easy to execute, and the results are proof of its effectiveness. Movement-Based RPOs Movement-based RPOs are plays that involve a post-snap decision by the quarterback based on the movement of a conflict defender relative to the route we tag to our run.
Again, just like our leverage-based plays, we try to minimize the gray area in the decision making for the quarterback by simplifying his read rules.
Football Option Play
In movement-based RPOs, there will always play option a second- or third-level conflict defender that the quarterback will read for movement. Since this is a post-snap decision, it has to be made quickly. Movement-based RPOs are effective versus two-high and one-high safety looks, and are great complements to our leverage-based conflict plays as well.
PerfectPervis From little league to the big leagues, the option play is a staple of strategy, confusion, and athleticism.
Diagram 5 We will, at times, combine a pre-snap, leverage-based RPO with a post-snap, movement-based RPO to give the quarterback multiple options to throw on each play. In this example, the quarterback can see pre-snap that we do not have leverage to throw the bubble screen into the boundary. However, we have an optimal look to throw the post-snap lookie route based off our read of the Mike linebacker. Movement-based RPOs are more difficult to execute, because the read is post-snap for the quarterback.
However, these types of RPOs put the most stress on a conflict defender. He is truly getting a run-pass conflict. We see that most of our explosive plays from Play option are movement-based in nature. The quarterback is responsible for knowing how many defenders each of these RPOs can handle and make a decision whether or not we have a numbers advantage on that play.
For example, we may have a run called that can handle six defenders in the box. If we align and there are only six defenders in the box, then it is to our advantage to hand the ball off and execute the run associated with that RPO. Many times, one-high safety defenses put us in numerical disadvantages for the run game, but leave one-on-one coverage on our receivers. As a result, most routes that we tag to numbers-based RPOs are designed to beat that type of coverage.
At Marshall and Miami, we loved running one-back play option. It can be run different ways and is optimal vs. You have six blockers for seven defenders, thus you have a numerical disadvantage. The box for us is defined as any time the defender who puts us at a numerical disadvantage is in a threatening position for the run. In Diagram 6, the seventh defender would be the Sam linebacker or the free safety.
Difference Between Play Action, RPO & Read Option
In this example, neither of them are in a threatening position to stop our run play, therefore, this is an optimal look to run the football. In Diagram 7, the defense aligned in a one-high safety defense with seven men in the box. They are in man-to-man coverage on the three receivers who are involved in the route tagged to our numbers-based RPO.
Defenses often give us numerical disadvantages by aligning in one-high safety coverages.